The Muslim Brotherhood announced
 that the country's constituent assembly will hold an up or down vote 
then on a new draft constitution that has roiled Egyptian politics for 
months. If it passes a body that appears packed with Islamist 
politicians, most of those from the Brotherhood, the constitution will 
then be put to a national referendum. One caveat is that, in the coinage
 of political scientist Marc Lynch, Egyptian politics since Mubarak have
 resembled Calvinball, with rules and deadlines and statements shifting constantly. 
Nevertheless President Mohamed Morsi,
 the Brotherhood politician who became the country's first freely 
elected president last June, appears committed to his current course. 
He's gambling the move will defuse an increasingly tense situation on 
the streets of Cairo. In the past week he's boldly (or recklessly, 
depending on your point of view) moved to break the constitutional 
impasse.
At
 the end of last week he issued a decree removing judicial oversight 
from the process, since he feared Egypt's judges would nullify the 
constituent assembly much as they'd nullified the election of parliament
 in June. That move had secular political forces warning that he was 
setting himself up as a dictator. The Brotherhood shot back that it was 
only a temporary move to ease passage of a constitution.
A sprawling constitution
But
 the constitution was the real issue all along. Secular Egyptians feared
 that Morsi and his Islamist allies were crafting a basic legal text 
that would move the country starkly in the direction of Islamic law, and
 argued that it was being drafted by a group that was far from 
representative of Egyptian society. From their point of view, they've 
been given two options: Live with Morsi holding all executive and 
legislative power, with broad immunity from judicial interference to 
boot; or, approve the constitution he favors.
Politicians on the assembly like Amr Moussa, a former foreign minister and Arab League
 chief who unsuccessfully ran for president, complained in recent weeks 
they weren't being given anywhere near sufficient time to review an 
ever-changing, expanding document, that at last count had over 230 
articles.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment