The Muslim Brotherhood announced
that the country's constituent assembly will hold an up or down vote
then on a new draft constitution that has roiled Egyptian politics for
months. If it passes a body that appears packed with Islamist
politicians, most of those from the Brotherhood, the constitution will
then be put to a national referendum. One caveat is that, in the coinage
of political scientist Marc Lynch, Egyptian politics since Mubarak have
resembled Calvinball, with rules and deadlines and statements shifting constantly.
Nevertheless President Mohamed Morsi,
the Brotherhood politician who became the country's first freely
elected president last June, appears committed to his current course.
He's gambling the move will defuse an increasingly tense situation on
the streets of Cairo. In the past week he's boldly (or recklessly,
depending on your point of view) moved to break the constitutional
impasse.
At
the end of last week he issued a decree removing judicial oversight
from the process, since he feared Egypt's judges would nullify the
constituent assembly much as they'd nullified the election of parliament
in June. That move had secular political forces warning that he was
setting himself up as a dictator. The Brotherhood shot back that it was
only a temporary move to ease passage of a constitution.
A sprawling constitution
But
the constitution was the real issue all along. Secular Egyptians feared
that Morsi and his Islamist allies were crafting a basic legal text
that would move the country starkly in the direction of Islamic law, and
argued that it was being drafted by a group that was far from
representative of Egyptian society. From their point of view, they've
been given two options: Live with Morsi holding all executive and
legislative power, with broad immunity from judicial interference to
boot; or, approve the constitution he favors.
Politicians on the assembly like Amr Moussa, a former foreign minister and Arab League
chief who unsuccessfully ran for president, complained in recent weeks
they weren't being given anywhere near sufficient time to review an
ever-changing, expanding document, that at last count had over 230
articles.
No comments:
Post a Comment